Interested in finding more jobs in Pittsburgh, PA? Click Here to create a Climber profile today!



Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University Work Values

Interested in finding out if you are the type of person this company is looking for? Create an account and take our patented DNA assessment now to see how you compare.


Daily Duties at Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University:

Researched, studied, developed, adapted and tested methods for assessing software process within organizations that write software. Participated in 10 software process assessments for large DoD and commercial organizations in order to deploy, test, and refine these techniques. Educated and raised awareness for software process improvement by speaking at local and national conferences. Conducting numerous tutorials and more than 10 training courses at the Software Engineering Institute. Measurably impacted the foundation of the original (and all future versions) of the Capability Maturity Model by prioritizing attention on requirements management at the lowest level.


What they like about Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University:

The social vibrance of a hiring firm is very important to you. Your ability to make and maintain friendships there is a critical part of your decision. You would likely be dissatisfied with a workplace that is quiet, cold, or otherwise not particularly social. When you investigate a new hiring company, ask recruiters, managers, and potential co-workers about the social life and opportunities there. This is especially important when you are relocating; moving dramatically alters your social sphere both inside and outside the workplace.



Information about Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University


Company Rank: 3.0 out of 5

Average length of employment : 3 years

Average salary of employees: $137,000

These are some of the questions we asked our climbers about their experiences with Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University:

05|
Were your performance expectations clearly communicated?

4.0

Were you recognized for meeting or exceeding expectations?

3.0

Did you feel like your personal contribution was important?

4.0

Was your career path clearly outlined and discussed?

2.0


03|
I would recommend this as a place of employment.
2.0
I believe in the purpose of this organization.
3.0
I would work for this organization again.
2.0
I feel employees are fairly compensated.
2.0


Climbers who worked at Software Engineering Institute At Carnegie Mellon University had these interests:

Books
Risk Taking: A Managerial Perspective This excellent book by Zur Shapira studies risk taking empirically from a managerial point of view. The book disproves classical risk taking theories and behaviors by using recorded data and evidence. Eye-opening for those who must pitch risky ventures
Software Engineering Risk Analysis and Management Robert N. Charette's 1989 book is a very useful text for explaining software risk, its analysis, its impact, and its management and control. I was privileged to work with Robert while at the SEI. Not only is the book still relevant after all these years
Continuous Risk Management Guidebook This "coffee table" book of risk identification and management techniques is still the starting point for any effective RM practice. My SEI colleagues authored this work and I reviewed it.
Managing the Software Process It was my deep pleasure and honor to know and work for the late Watts Humphrey at the Software Engineering Institute. This is the seminal work that launched the software process improvement movement in the United States.
Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) Professionals & Researchers A LinkedIn discussion group for toll collection users and providers.
Software Project Survival Guide Steve McConnell's book on practical software project management is a very useful tool for addressing the issues you will encounter.
Websites
CMM - Integrated

http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=67460&trk=myg_ugrp_ovr

A LinkedIn discussion group for the Integrated Capability Maturity Model


Back